Skip to content

Sounds like…

Tuesday, 17 August 2010


That’s me. Just so I cannot be accused of anything later…

On May 30, 1806, by Imperial and Royal Decree of Emperor Napoleon III (merci à Otir for catching my mistake!) Napoleon I , the Parisian Sanhedrin was convoked.

But wait, you say. How could the Sanhedrin, which was formally disbanded in 358 CE, be reconstituted by a non-Jewish Emperor of France?

It couldn’t.

Napoleon first assembled a group of 112 prominent citizens. Known as the “Assembly of Jewish Notables,” these gentlemen we handpicked by representatives of the French and Italian governments. Hm…sounds just a little suspicious. And if it doesn’t sound kosher, it probably isn’t. Once the “Assembly” had been given a list of twelve questions and had crafted their response, the “Great Sanhedrin” was summoned in order to ratify the answers. A good move on the part of Napoleon. By using an ancient symbol of Jewish authority, it lent an air of validity to the undertaking as well as ingratiate the Emperor to the local Jewish community. Moreover, it raised Messianic hopes in a people who were seeking salvation from (clearly) unlikely sources.

The questions in question:

1. Is it lawful for Jews to have more than one wife?

2. Is divorce allowed by the Jewish religion? Is divorce valid, although pronounced not by courts of justice but by virtue of laws in contradiction to the French code?

3. May a Jewess marry a Christian, or a Jew a Christian woman? or does Jewish law order that the Jews should only intermarry among themselves?

4. In the eyes of Jews are Frenchmen not of the Jewish religion considered as brethren or as strangers?

5. What conduct does Jewish law prescribe toward Frenchmen not of the Jewish religion?

6. Do the Jews born in France, and treated by the law as French citizens, acknowledge France as their country? Are they bound to defend it? Are they bound to obey the laws and follow the directions of the civil code?

7. Who elects the rabbis?

8. What kind of police jurisdiction do the rabbis exercise over the Jews? What judicial power do they exercise over them?

9. Are the police jurisdiction of the rabbis and the forms of the election regulated by Jewish law, or are they only sanctioned by custom?

10. Are there professions from which the Jews are excluded by their law?

11. Does Jewish law forbid the Jews to take usury from their brethren?

12. Does it forbid, or does it allow, usury in dealings with strangers? (answers may be found here.)

In other words, if we emancipate these Jews and allow them to become French citizens, are we risking a fifth column? Will they be Frenchmen? Or just a bunch of Hebrews content to maintain their oddities and, *gasp,* pollute the French way of life?

Hadn’t really given this much thought. Until this morning when I heard a story on the BBC NewsHour and one single sentence drew my attention.

“Do they follow Shari’a law or US Constitution law?”

Which sounded eerily familiar. Except that the “they” have morphed from Jews to Muslims.

The story continued with a response from University of Northern Florida professor, Dr. Parvez Ahmed, who said, “There is no action from within the Muslim community to either implement Shari’a law to use to transcend or to circumvent American Law.” I am guessing this was not the first time his loyalty was called into question.

There’s a new hatred in town. It’s called Islamophobia and it is poisoning our society. We are living in a time of suspicion and fear that has turned into vitriolic hatred. While it is true that those who perpetuated the horrific crimes on September 11th were of the Muslim faith, the vilification of all things Muslim is just wrong. As is the intolerance that has grabbed hold of us. There were Muslim victims that day. And there are kind and moderate American-Muslims who continue to be victims of hatred and prejudice.

Here is a general rule. If a statement is being made about “other,” insert “Jew” in its place. Then if it rubs you the wrong way, you know the answer.


These three labels inform my views on tolerance, community-building, and religious freedom. These three labels define me and provide a vision that is inclusive of us all.

11 Comments leave one →
  1. Rebgiraffe permalink
    Tuesday, 17 August 2010 9:32 pm

    This is a very important statement. I’d love to see it published in the Forward.

    • Frume Sarah permalink*
      Tuesday, 17 August 2010 10:14 pm

      Channeling BubbeGiraffe again… 🙂

  2. Amitzah permalink
    Tuesday, 17 August 2010 9:38 pm

    Will this be coming up again during HHD services? It reminds me of a moment not so long ago when I was talking to a man at work and he noticed a Muslim woman and her children walking down the hall. There was nothing suspicious about her presence, nothing malicious, yet he kept watching her until the family eventually left. It made me a little sad inside.

    • Frume Sarah permalink*
      Tuesday, 17 August 2010 10:15 pm


  3. Wednesday, 18 August 2010 9:00 am

    Well said, this issue has certainly polluted our news long enough. Now political candidates for Florida offices are discussing this issue in debates, commercials etc as if it has anything to do with Florida politics. All I care to say is THANK YOU FOR SAYING IT OUT LOUD.

    • Frume Sarah permalink*
      Saturday, 21 August 2010 10:55 pm

      I’m always good for saying what others are thinking 😉

      I just can’t believe that there aren’t more pressing issues in Florida to occupy the time of the candidates.

  4. Wednesday, 18 August 2010 9:12 am

    Wonderfully said, Frume Sarah! And I agree 100%. Education goes a long way. Take a class or read a book about Islam. It’s not a faith of terrorisim nor does it harm anyone.

    • Frume Sarah permalink*
      Saturday, 21 August 2010 10:56 pm

      Nope. Not in-and-of-itself. It’s when fanatics take text into their own hands — and I mean fanatics of every stripe — that things start to get distorted.

  5. Saturday, 21 August 2010 6:58 pm

    Just to let you know that the first Sanhedrin was called upon by the Emperor Napoleon I (the first Napoleon), that’s one of the thing that he should be given credit for, as he also did terrible things, but politically he had a good move towards the Jews of France (Napoleon the third wasn’t born at the time, I think).

    Of course this comment is a minor detail that shouldn’t derail from the insteresting post and point of view you developed here!

    • Frume Sarah permalink*
      Saturday, 21 August 2010 10:54 pm

      Merci!!! I cannot believe that I didn’t catch that mistake. Thank you. And thanks for stopping by and sharing your thoughts.


  1. Trendsetter « Frume Sarah's World

What's On Your Mind??

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: